<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Librations &#187; by Emily Petty Puckett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librations.us/category/good-librations/by-emily-pp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librations.us</link>
	<description>Get here fast and then we&#039;ll take it slow.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:02:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CONNECT! (in some fashion)</title>
		<link>http://www.librations.us/2009/09/05/connect-in-some-fashion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librations.us/2009/09/05/connect-in-some-fashion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Emily Petty Puckett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librations.us/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am starting my second (and final) year at SI this week and I am trying to prepare for the incoming deluge of information and communications by updating my various connecting portals to my classmates, my employers, and the world in general. Obviously connectivity depends on personal preferences but I find it amazing that we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am starting my second (and final) year at SI this week and I am trying to prepare for the incoming deluge of information and communications by updating my various connecting portals to my classmates, my employers, and the world in general. Obviously connectivity depends on personal preferences but I find it amazing that we all have so many identities online these days, more and more reflecting portals for our &#8220;real&#8221; personalit(ies) (Skype, LinkedIn, Facebook) but just as many for the other identities we would like to hold true as parts of ourselves. I am now connected on Skype (I just got my first camera for my computer. It is an old skool eyeball and I am thinking of adding antennae or something to give it a personality.) so I can talk to my niece in Colorado. I am now connected on LinkedIn so I can attract potential employers with my stunning resume and associated activities. I am about to buy a new cell phone and just upgraded my text plan so I can be accessible anywhere (pretty much. I still won&#8217;t do the iphone or blackberry thing) to my employers and classmates. I am entrenched in Facebook. I forget about my MySpace profile but that&#8217;s still out there too&#8230; wasting away with past updates and song preferences.</p>
<p>And today I tried to become a member of ALA and PLA. I got about halfway through the form and their website went down. Again and again. Why is it that the national organization for those who network and connect people to information and people to people keeps repeatedly discouraging me from joining their throngs of committees, round tables, organizations, and initiatives through poorly managed web content? If I continue to have trouble with this my ADD-attuned fingers may just forget about one of the potentially most important connecting opportunities I need to take advantage of me. It&#8217;s what happened last year at this time. I need to make amends but I may end up hanging out on Skype instead. Or start making YouTube videos for my own amusement. Really, I think I just need a beer with friends.</p>
<p>So: ALA and PLA members&#8211;was it hard for you to sign up? Has it been worth it to be part of the organization? Do you use Skype? What&#8217;s it like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librations.us/2009/09/05/connect-in-some-fashion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything in its place.</title>
		<link>http://www.librations.us/2009/07/31/everything-in-its-place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librations.us/2009/07/31/everything-in-its-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good Librations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by Emily Petty Puckett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dewey decimal classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librations.us/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay so I just saw this so I am admittedly engaging in a knee-jerk reaction but I ran across a completely new term today: High-Tech Anthropology®. It was created and registered by a computer programmer, 		analyst, architect, manager, and executive and addresses the lack of community/cultural/people sensitivity in software design. I&#8217;m all about cultural sensitivity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay so I <em>just</em> saw this so I am admittedly engaging in a knee-jerk reaction but I ran across a completely new term today: <a href="http://www.menloinnovations.com/method/anthropology.htm" target="_blank">High-Tech Anthropology</a>®. It was created and registered by a computer programmer, 		analyst, architect, manager, and executive and addresses the lack of community/cultural/people sensitivity in software design. I&#8217;m all about cultural sensitivity and I think that programmers and professionals creating tools for people to use should know the user very well. And since anthropologists study pretty much anything related to humanity, especially including tools, the idea of merging these two fields isn&#8217;t really that <a href="http://www.travisbreaux.org/anthropology.html" target="_blank">far-fetched</a>. My problem, however, is with this term&#8230;its implications and its use.</p>
<p>I wonder about their methods:</p>
<p>&#8220;Interestingly enough, many of the best practices did not come 		from computer science; they came from anthropology. So we began to 		talk to anthropologists, study their techniques, and learn from their 		discipline. Eventually, we even called our practice &#8220;High-Tech 		Anthropology®&#8221; and our team members &#8220;High-Tech 		Anthropologists®.&#8221;</p>
<p>I got my undergraduate degree in anthropology. I&#8217;m getting an MSI to become an ALA-certified librarian. I like titles and I do, generally speaking, like the educational landscapes I must traverse through to get these titles. <em>Talking</em> to an anthropologist doesn&#8217;t make you one.  I feel like this organization, however well intended, has made the same mistake they seek to redress: they are making assumptions that their methods and approaches are correct and appropriate without taking into context the paths that are needed to properly use these approaches and methods.</p>
<p>Besides, anthro is in DDC 301 and computer programming is in DDC 005. That&#8217;s like stacks and stacks away.</p>
<p>I espouse interdisciplinarity, the intellectual weight of non-expert knowledge and I like the<em> idea </em>of a practice of High-Tech Anthropology®, I just have a feeling that this is well intended but ultimately kind of misses the point. That or I just pointed out how much of a hypocrite I am and that I really am a Category Nazi who doesn&#8217;t like to shake up her p&#8217;s and q&#8217;s. Probably my reaction is a bit of both.</p>
Emily Petty Puckett [Community Development Associate] www.librations.us]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librations.us/2009/07/31/everything-in-its-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Step away from the powerpoint&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.librations.us/2009/07/26/step-away-from-the-powerpoint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librations.us/2009/07/26/step-away-from-the-powerpoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[by Emily Petty Puckett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education & training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerpoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librations.us/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I was browsing through the links provided by my friends on Facebook (impressed by the way we are all using these technologies to increasingly share and disseminate information) and I came across a snarky commented link by a former professor of mine from my college years. He had shared a link to an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I was browsing through the links provided by my friends on Facebook (impressed by the way we are all using these technologies to increasingly share and disseminate information) and I came across a snarky commented link by a former professor of mine from my college years. He had shared a link to an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education  about  <a id="slik" title="&quot;teach naked&quot;" href="http://chronicle.com/article/Teach-Naked-Effort-Strips/47398/" target="_blank">&#8220;teaching naked&#8221;</a>. Whoa! Wait! What? No, it&#8217;s not an article about liberating your inner nudist, but actually about teaching without the comfort of certain computer technology (I know&#8230; not quite so exciting, huh?). You can read the article for yourself but it&#8217;s basically calling for college lecturers and professors to stop using their powerpoint presentations as a crutch and go back to lecturing and creative teaching. This article caught my attention on several levels: as a student who experienced the transition to powerpoint presentations from straight lectures in college, as a graduate student in a School of Information where digital information technology is pervasive and ever present, as a budding champion of information literacy. I personally think this article should be printed out, old-fashioned style, and put in every (SI) professor&#8217;s mailbox, but that&#8217;s another story. The article has a great point, that I hope I can carry with me as I move through my profession: to really reach people you have to be creative, innovative, and passionate about what you&#8217;re sharing. You can&#8217;t rely on your slides to push you through your &#8220;lesson&#8221;. You have to reach inside yourself and [insert cheesy imagery about self-esteem here, personally I see Bastion fighting the Nothing or the Goonies pooling their talents to beat the Fratellis and get the Rich Stuff]. I know this sounds quite idyllic and naive and I know that it can be hard to be &#8220;innovative&#8221; all the time but teaching and learning isn&#8217;t a solo project&#8211;it&#8217;s an iterative process through which students and teachers share and analyze information. (Right? At least I think it&#8217;s supposed to be that way). It&#8217;s a challenge to find or create, as we have all discussed, &#8220;teachable moments&#8221; in a daily professional setting. But the article cites some interesting evidence about how lectures are more memorable if taught in a dynamic way that includes discussion and two-way communication. The article reminded me that no matter how technologies change, the way we as human beings interact and bond with each other doesn&#8217;t necessarily change. We all want to be part of the conversation and feel like we have something personal to contribute or to gain from interactions (even in class). This is why I totally agree with the article&#8217;s premise: that profs (and any other teachers&#8211;librarians, project coordinators, whatever) need to be dynamic and inclusive when they are sharing their knowledge with others. I think we&#8217;ve all seen examples of using technology to extend the power of sharing (ahem, what are you reading right now?) and examples of how it can be used as a crutch with narcoleptic results (I will not name names). So as we move forward in our lives and try to share our experiences with others we have to remember not to let our technology control us, but to control our technology. Isn&#8217;t there a movie quote about that somewhere?</p>
Emily Petty Puckett [Community Development Associate] www.librations.us]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librations.us/2009/07/26/step-away-from-the-powerpoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

