<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aardvark, and other words that start with &#8216;A&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librations.us/2009/07/21/aardvark-and-other-words-that-start-with-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librations.us/2009/07/21/aardvark-and-other-words-that-start-with-a/</link>
	<description>Get here fast and then we&#039;ll take it slow.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:37:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kdt</title>
		<link>http://www.librations.us/2009/07/21/aardvark-and-other-words-that-start-with-a/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>kdt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librations.us/?p=200#comment-9</guid>
		<description>A is for Awesome post, Anand! Thanks for bringing Aardvark to my attention; I hadn&#039;t heard of it before. Here are my three thoughts:

&lt;strong&gt;1.&lt;/strong&gt; I had the same basic response to Raz&#039;s &quot;what&#039;s in it for me?&quot; as you did, although since I&#039;d already read your response, mine was much less vehement. :) As a librarian, I have no trouble imagining why some people might want to help others find answers. As a net-gen-er (who&#039;s testing out another term for my millennial status), I can also imagine putting out good vibes on the internet and expecting my useful answer karma to reap future rewards (either for myself or my friends/network).

&lt;strong&gt;2. &lt;/strong&gt;Recent interactions with my local IT department have led me to believe that your Thought #2 might pretty prevalent among the business/baby boomer set.

&lt;strong&gt;3. &lt;/strong&gt;I feel like twitter is already useful for me in the way that Aardvark wants to be useful to people. Here&#039;s an example of a network-enabled reference question referral that happened in my twitter feed today:



&lt;blockquote&gt;my best friend from home, emily--
&lt;strong&gt;egrecque&lt;/strong&gt; ask a librarian: @katiedt, where can I find some user-friendly info on fair use?

my call for additional help within the hour, on the way out the door to a meeting--
&lt;strong&gt;katiedt&lt;/strong&gt; RT @g_gerg @mollyali &amp; other fair users: @egrecque ask a librarian: @katiedt, where can I find some user-friendly info on fair use?

molly&#039;s response to me within minutes--
&lt;strong&gt;mollyali&lt;/strong&gt; @katiedt My go-to resource is http://fairuse.stanford.edu/

my forward to emily when I returned from my meeting--
&lt;strong&gt;katiedt&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks RT @mollyali: My go-to resource is http://fairuse.stanford.edu/ @egrecque

emily&#039;s thanks when she got back on twitter later--
&lt;strong&gt;egrecque&lt;/strong&gt; thanks, @katiedt, @mollyali&lt;/blockquote&gt;



The success of this strategy might depend on the type of people in a particular twitter community -- for instance, there are a lot of information professionals among my followed/followers who seem to be predisposed to answering questions via twitter.

This example from earlier today was actually the first time I&#039;ve done this sort of referral; I think it could have gone even better if I hadn&#039;t been rushed to head out to my meeting when I was posting my retweet of Emily&#039;s question (all the @ replies got a little confusing -- if my structure had been simpler, Molly might have replied directly to Emily). In the past, I have answered other folks&#039; questions on twitter, but I&#039;ve never used the RT function to bring other librarians into a reference question thread. The benefit of this method is that if people take advantage of the social norms of retweeting (appending the newly mentioned user with the @ symbol), everyone can follow an answer back to its source.

Could it be that this people-smart method of answering questions via referral allows us more source authority than the machine-smart method Aardvark uses? My gut says yes. But again, your network may vary.

Also, if I wanted an immediate response, I would probably... go ask a librarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A is for Awesome post, Anand! Thanks for bringing Aardvark to my attention; I hadn&#8217;t heard of it before. Here are my three thoughts:</p>
<p><strong>1.</strong> I had the same basic response to Raz&#8217;s &#8220;what&#8217;s in it for me?&#8221; as you did, although since I&#8217;d already read your response, mine was much less vehement. :) As a librarian, I have no trouble imagining why some people might want to help others find answers. As a net-gen-er (who&#8217;s testing out another term for my millennial status), I can also imagine putting out good vibes on the internet and expecting my useful answer karma to reap future rewards (either for myself or my friends/network).</p>
<p><strong>2. </strong>Recent interactions with my local IT department have led me to believe that your Thought #2 might pretty prevalent among the business/baby boomer set.</p>
<p><strong>3. </strong>I feel like twitter is already useful for me in the way that Aardvark wants to be useful to people. Here&#8217;s an example of a network-enabled reference question referral that happened in my twitter feed today:</p>
<blockquote><p>my best friend from home, emily&#8211;<br />
<strong>egrecque</strong> ask a librarian: @katiedt, where can I find some user-friendly info on fair use?</p>
<p>my call for additional help within the hour, on the way out the door to a meeting&#8211;<br />
<strong>katiedt</strong> RT @g_gerg @mollyali &#038; other fair users: @egrecque ask a librarian: @katiedt, where can I find some user-friendly info on fair use?</p>
<p>molly&#8217;s response to me within minutes&#8211;<br />
<strong>mollyali</strong> @katiedt My go-to resource is <a href="http://fairuse.stanford.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://fairuse.stanford.edu/</a></p>
<p>my forward to emily when I returned from my meeting&#8211;<br />
<strong>katiedt</strong> Thanks RT @mollyali: My go-to resource is <a href="http://fairuse.stanford.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://fairuse.stanford.edu/</a> @egrecque</p>
<p>emily&#8217;s thanks when she got back on twitter later&#8211;<br />
<strong>egrecque</strong> thanks, @katiedt, @mollyali</p></blockquote>
<p>The success of this strategy might depend on the type of people in a particular twitter community &#8212; for instance, there are a lot of information professionals among my followed/followers who seem to be predisposed to answering questions via twitter.</p>
<p>This example from earlier today was actually the first time I&#8217;ve done this sort of referral; I think it could have gone even better if I hadn&#8217;t been rushed to head out to my meeting when I was posting my retweet of Emily&#8217;s question (all the @ replies got a little confusing &#8212; if my structure had been simpler, Molly might have replied directly to Emily). In the past, I have answered other folks&#8217; questions on twitter, but I&#8217;ve never used the RT function to bring other librarians into a reference question thread. The benefit of this method is that if people take advantage of the social norms of retweeting (appending the newly mentioned user with the @ symbol), everyone can follow an answer back to its source.</p>
<p>Could it be that this people-smart method of answering questions via referral allows us more source authority than the machine-smart method Aardvark uses? My gut says yes. But again, your network may vary.</p>
<p>Also, if I wanted an immediate response, I would probably&#8230; go ask a librarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
